| [05:41:14] | <pcambra[m]> | <paul121[m]> "I'm not so sure about how farmOS..." <- We do this for client work already, we used to deliver modules but now we're delivering recipes :) which is awesome, what is not supported yet is upgrade paths of stuff, I was discussing with Adam in Vienna about this, and it seems it wouldn't be that big of a module but even if you do strict=false, the configs are not updated |
| [05:42:11] | <pcambra[m]> | <mstenta[m]> "Maybe farmOS 5.x will just be..." <- are you sure?? distributions make sense for farmos |
| [07:08:08] | <mstenta[m]> | Thanks for the PR reviews paul121! 🙌 🎉 |
| [07:08:18] | <mstenta[m]> | I've merged https://github.com/farmOS/farmOS/pull/1006 |
| [07:09:05] | <mstenta[m]> | I rebased https://github.com/farmOS/farmOS/pull/1007 - I will wait to confirm that tests still pass and then merge that as well. |
| [07:09:40] | <mstenta[m]> | Unless I hear an objection from anyone here (still in the process of reviewing?) ... speak now! :-) |
| [07:10:37] | <mstenta[m]> | <pcambra[m]> "are you sure?? distributions..." <- Haha I think you're right pcambra ... but I'm eager to see how we can leverage recipes more either way :-) |
| [07:10:58] | <mstenta[m]> | mstenta[m]: (the point you made about upgrade paths is an important one) |
| [13:48:31] | <mstenta[m]> | Maybe we can make this a topic for this week's dev call: https://github.com/farmOS/farmOS/pull/1009 |