| [07:55:28] | <pcambra[m]> | not related with the PRs above, I'm curious why is this? https://git.drupalcode.org/project/farm_biodynamic/-/commit/9062624184d7... |
| [07:56:32] | <mstenta[m]> | pcambra: see https://www.drupal.org/project/farm_forest/issues/3190919 |
| [07:56:49] | <mstenta[m]> | Although that was a while ago... I wonder if anything has changed |
| [07:58:34] | <pcambra[m]> | mstenta[m]: Ahhh I remember now, thanks |
| [12:22:44] | <pcambra[m]> | <pcambra[m]> "Ahhh I remember now, thanks" <- I don't foresee any changes to distros, for better or for worse, everything is going to recipes and site templates now |
| [12:24:44] | <mstenta[m]> | pcambra[m]: Fair enough! |
| [12:25:03] | <mstenta[m]> | mstenta[m]: Maybe farmOS 5.x will just be a bunch of recipes 😄 |
| [16:36:01] | <paul121[m]> | yeaaaa I've been reading about recipes the last week. May use them at my new job |
| [16:36:45] | <paul121[m]> | mstenta have you seen the new Config Actions API? It's a part of core but only used by Recipes at this point: https://project.pages.drupalcode.org/distributions_recipes/config_action... |
| [16:38:07] | <mstenta[m]> | I've seen it, but haven't really wrapped my head around use cases yet. |
| [16:42:17] | <paul121[m]> | I'm not so sure about how farmOS core would use it itself. But if you ever have some configuration you want to mange & apply to multiple sites, and can't/don't want to do it with a module, the recipe is kinda nice |
| [16:43:02] | <paul121[m]> | I'm thinking to configure a specific environment in a reproducible way, kinda like a demo |
| [16:50:32] | <mstenta[m]> | Cool that makes sense |