| [13:51:21] | <mstenta[m]> | symbioquine paul121 just pinning this for future reference... https://github.com/paratestphp/paratest#test-token |
| [13:51:51] | <mstenta[m]> | I also found this issue on drupal.org where they are considering using paratest: https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/2781123 |
| [13:52:33] | <mstenta[m]> | Looks like @Mile23 encountered a similar issue as we are in comment #12 https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/2781123#comment-12954281 |
| [13:54:01] | <mstenta[m]> | This also looked relevant: https://github.com/paratestphp/paratest/issues/763 |
| [13:54:26] | <mstenta[m]> | to be continued... just wanted to drop those links so I can close the tabs and pick it up another time :-) |
| [15:45:43] | <guillermo-farmos> | <symbioquine[m]> "The way it's written, it looks..." <- I think the child should default into a group child to the mother's group.... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/39d7e69251...) |
| [16:21:40] | <guillermo-farmos> | > <@symbioquine:matrix.org> The way it's written, it looks like there's no way to *not* have the child in a group if the mother is in one.... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/e55bc9e72a...) |
| [16:23:52] | <symbioquine[m]> | <guillermo-farmos> "I think the child should default..." <- > <@guillermo-farmos:matrix.org> I think the child should default into a child-group of the mother's group.... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/ad62c7273c...) |
| [16:24:34] | <symbioquine[m]> | That's a separate concern from what I was talking about though. I was just talking about where in the code the default selection occurs... |
| [16:25:24] | <symbioquine[m]> | Right now it occurs on form submit - which makes it impossible to intentionally choose not to put the new animal in a group. (Which would be a valid thing to want to do.) |
| [16:26:02] | <symbioquine[m]> | I was suggesting that it would be better for it to occur when the form is rendered so that the default value can be cleared - if desired. |
| [16:30:34] | <guillermo-farmos> | symbioquine[m]: That's my concern. For the calving season, calving 1000 cows on a rainy day with mud all around, the farmer would prefer not to have to clear and retype a custom group name all the time. However, I presume the child could default to the mother's group and then all children be bulk-processed into their own group later on |
| [16:32:29] | <guillermo-farmos> | <symbioquine[m]> "I was suggesting that it would..." <- I understand then this is a step forward in that direction 👍️ |
| [16:33:08] | <symbioquine[m]> | What I was suggesting wouldn't change the default behavior of using the mother's group so if that farmer didn't touch the group field they could still do that bulk-group-assignment strategy you describe. |
| [16:34:21] | <symbioquine[m]> | It would just make it possible to skip assigning a group - by an extra click/tap. |
| [16:36:07] | <symbioquine[m]> | Regardless of what group was selected, the bulk-group-assignment strategy could probably still be used by going to the animals view and filtering by species/breed and by birthdate. |
| [16:36:44] | <symbioquine[m]> | Obviously it would depend on the operation whether that makes sense, but there are a lot of options. |
| [16:42:37] | <guillermo-farmos> | ( I hope I am not distracting you guys with to much time explaining. I hope I could be up an running soon offering some coding ... it may be that I am not up to it though 😐️ ) |
| [16:43:48] | <mstenta[m]> | All good guillermo-farmos! Great to have the feedback, ideas, and discussion! |
| [17:57:09] | <guillermo-farmos> | symbioquine: Where / How would you like me to feedback Asset-Link issues? |