[20:05:11] | * piegeux[m] has joined #farmos |
[20:05:11] | <piegeux[m]> | https://phys.org/news/2023-06-digital-tool-enables-farmers-decisions.html |
[03:26:03] | * explore has quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) |
[03:48:17] | * explore has joined #farmos |
[13:53:34] | <mstenta[m]> | Reminds me of LandPKS! |
[13:54:02] | <mstenta[m]> | https://landpotential.org/ |
[14:13:53] | <mstenta[m]> | jgaehring: saw your comments on https://github.com/farmOS/farmOS-map/issues/190 - maybe it would make sense to discuss here in chat with symbioquine and paul121 ? Or on a dev call potentially? It's outside of my expertise... but the gist of your explanations makes sense I think! If the issue is blocking you and there isn't an easy workaround, might be faster to discuss live? |
[14:14:17] | <mstenta[m]> | I think paul121 is away this week however |
[14:14:48] | <symbioquine[m]> | Just replied to one facet of the issue... |
[14:26:45] | <jgaehring[m]> | <symbioquine[m]> "Just replied to one facet of the..." <- thanks, yea, prefer to address it there |
[14:32:09] | <jgaehring[m]> | this is not a major issue for me at present, b/c like I say there, the SurveyStack implementation is not even using farmOS-map from the npm registry, but literally copy-n-pasting it b/c that's easier for them, but I think that underlines my reasoning for why farmOS-map needs a separate bundle if it wants to support use at all as an npm package |
[14:32:31] | <mstenta[m]> | gotcha! cool... just didn' |
[14:32:45] | <mstenta[m]> | t want you to feel blocked :-) |
[14:35:24] | <jgaehring[m]> | I hadn't really intended to submit a PR, initially, but at this point I think most of the work is there in the issue thread and in the config I referenced from my geotrace library, just needs to be adapted to the file structure I mentioned at https://github.com/farmOS/farmOS-map/issues/190#issuecomment-1571127131 |