| [08:54:44] | <symbioquine[m]> | <mstenta[m]> "I put together a first pass at..." <- This is going to be awesome documentation to have! Left a few minor review comments. |
| [08:54:45] | <lordeddi[m]> | Hi there, there is an admin here in this room. Though im not sure what the admins time zone is... |
| [08:54:56] | * DavidWilson[m] has joined #farmos |
| [08:54:57] | <DavidWilson[m]> | Hello, how can I contact any admin of farmier? I sent an email, but i have no response |
| [15:06:05] | <mstenta[m]> | I'll send you a direct message... standby... |
| [15:06:06] | <DavidWilson[m]> | Oh I see :( please read my email |
| [15:06:06] | <symbioquine[m]> | <mstenta[m]> "I put together a first pass at..." <- Left a couple more comments/questions, but otherwise 🚢 |
| [15:06:06] | <DavidWilson[m]> | s/email/mail/ |
| [15:06:06] | <mstenta[m]> | I don't see an email from you, however. 🤔 |
| [15:06:06] | <mstenta[m]> | Hi David Wilson I'm the one to talk to :-) |
| [16:07:16] | <mstenta[m]> | paul121 symbioquine: just had another thought with regard to our open question: "does farmOS need to increase its major version to 3.x for Drupal 10"... |
| [16:08:28] | <mstenta[m]> | I think we do, if only because it will then require any custom/contrib modules to update their composer.json files to farmos/farmos ^3.0 to indicate their compatibility with D10 |
| [16:09:09] | <mstenta[m]> | Otherwise there's a risk that they aren't actually compatible with ^2.0 anymore |
| [16:11:03] | <mstenta[m]> | So just like Drupal needs to increase it's major version alongside Symfony major versions, I think we do as well |
| [16:15:40] | <FarmerEd[m]> | That makes sense. |
| [16:18:17] | <FarmerEd[m]> | But it could put the fear into some folks that it would be like moving from 1.x to 2.x |
| [16:20:02] | <mstenta[m]> | Then they will be pleasantly surprised when it isn't! 😄 |
| [16:29:42] | <paul121[m]> | Makes sense. Probably means modules need to make a major release as well |
| [16:30:32] | <mstenta[m]> | Perhaps - but maybe only if they make major changes? |
| [16:30:34] | <mstenta[m]> | Or... oh because they might try to use them on v2? |
| [16:31:18] | <paul121[m]> | I think? |
| [16:31:52] | <paul121[m]> | I mean, if you bump the modules farmOS/farmOS dependency up a major version. It seems like the same argument as Drupal following Symfony major versions |
| [16:33:31] | <FarmerEd[m]> | Will it not be the case that many modules will be simultaneously compatible with Drupal 9/10 |
| [16:33:48] | <mstenta[m]> | Yes that's true too |
| [16:34:03] | <mstenta[m]> | So yea it'll probably be a case-by-case if they need a major version increment |
| [16:34:51] | <mstenta[m]> | and in their `composer.json` they can have `"farmos/farmos": "^2.0 || ^3.0",` to indicate that they work for both |
| [16:35:16] | <mstenta[m]> | but it will be necessary for them to add the ^3.0 manually as a way to indicate that they have indeed confirmed that they are compatible |
| [16:39:20] | <mstenta[m]> | commented on our tracking issue to reference this conversation: https://www.drupal.org/project/farm/issues/3330490#comment-14956960 |
| [16:47:41] | <symbioquine[m]> | I don't think I'll support 2.* for any of the modules I maintain once a 3.* is out and stable. I'd rather have less surface area to test/support - especially if it's a trivial migration effort between the two. |
| [16:54:52] | <FarmerEd[m]> | At least you got a stable 2.0 out before 3.0 😄 |
| [16:55:32] | <mstenta[m]> | Yea, well it's also hard to say when we'll be able to jump to D10 |
| [16:55:33] | <mstenta[m]> | Depends on dependencies |
| [16:55:43] | <mstenta[m]> | A story as old as time |