IRC logs for #farmOS, 2019-04-19 (GMT)

2019-04-18
2019-04-20
TimeNickMessage
[20:45:31]* JustTB has joined #farmos
[22:55:20]* JustTB has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
[23:08:37]* JustTB has joined #farmos
[05:10:21]* JustTB has quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
[06:08:41]* JustTB has joined #farmos
[06:21:16]<ludwa6>g’day group. First day following FarmOS install, am working to add the many Areas on my farm (10 properties, each its own set of LandPlots and, some with quite a few beds), but it’s going kinda slow. In fact i cannot edit geometry thru my browser (Chrome Version 73.0.3683.103 (Official Build) (64-bit), on macOS 10.13.6 High Sierra) at all; can create (or import) polygon, and activate the edit feature, but double-clicking on vertices to
[06:21:17]<ludwa6>resize has no effect at all. Is it just me, i wonder, or is this a replicated problem?
[06:23:36]<ludwa6>Whups, i should clarify: mine is a hosted instance, at FarmOS.net.
[06:52:27]<mstenta[m]>ludwa6: have you had a chance to read the mapping user guide?
[06:52:56]<ludwa6>yep. only it doesn’t work as per the docs, when it comes to editing polygons. not in my setup.
[06:52:57]<mstenta[m]>Did you click the Modify button before trying to click vertices?
[06:53:13]<mstenta[m]>Oh ok, maybe you found a bug
[06:53:18]<ludwa6>edit button.
[06:53:29]<ludwa6>modify? let me check, brb…
[06:53:36]<mstenta[m]>Are you able to draw?
[06:54:35]<ludwa6>i was able to draw. had some trouble closing the polygon -double click did not do it- but was able to finally close it somehow (sorry, can’t say how)
[06:55:50]<ludwa6>now if i click on the edit button (icon w/ drawing hand), the polygon turns blue, vertices show up on scrollover… but i can’t move them, via doublelick, nor right click and drag, nor none of the usual gestures.
[06:56:30]<mstenta[m]>Hmm
[06:57:22]<mstenta[m]>I'm currently eating breakfast with my toddler (7am here). Sorry can't be much help at the moment
[06:57:43]<mstenta[m]>There is a "mapping with farmOS" vid on YouTube you could try watching
[06:57:46]<ludwa6>oh, no problem man, don’t lose quality time over this 5hit :-)
[06:57:47]<mstenta[m]>Just to make sure
[06:58:12]<mstenta[m]>If it is a bug we should file a report
[06:58:39]<ludwa6>ok, we can debug later; you finish breakfast, i’m online for some hours yet, working on this & that
[06:59:19]<mstenta[m]>Cool sounds good
[06:59:26]<mstenta[m]>Good luck!
[06:59:31]<ludwa6>thnks
[07:36:46]<ludwa6>mkay; i watched the video, and after playing around a bit, i think i’ve got the hang of creating and editing polygons.
[07:47:45]<ludwa6>The editor has some nice features, but i still think i’d rather import all these Area objects in the form of .KML files that i can create/ edit/ manage much easier in QGIS… If only i could export/ import all in the form of a single .KML, only that didn’t work when i tried it yesterday.
[07:52:28]<mstenta[m]>Oh great! (Re: editing)
[07:53:04]<mstenta[m]>Oh I thought the bulk kml import did work for you yesterday...
[07:53:12]<mstenta[m]>Just not the subfolders part, right?
[07:57:29]<ludwa6>right -i could not do .KML with nested objects, only a simple polygon
[07:58:07]<ludwa6>doing my whole farm this way -well over 100 objects, minimum- would be quite tedious.
[07:59:44]<ludwa6>i’m trying at this point to get a sense of scope: what it would make sense for me to manage in farmOS, and what’s better managed outside… And how i can integrate information across the application boundaries.
[08:00:58]<ludwa6>I see that you’ve got some sort of API. Are there people using it to do the kind of thing i’m talking about?
[08:14:36]<mstenta[m]>I wonder if you can export multiple areas without nesting them
[08:14:53]<mstenta[m]>Then you can do more than one at a time
[08:15:17]<mstenta[m]>Yes the API is a good way to build integrations with other systems
[08:15:31]<mstenta[m]>If you're comfortable with programming
[08:16:06]<mstenta[m]>Still pretty early days of that. We are using it for the Android/iOS app
[08:25:01]<ludwa6>I see. And it’s possible to ship Area data in&out via not just .KML, but also CSV i gather -yes? Can also ship all other data objects I/O via .CSV?
[08:57:49]<ludwa6>cool -i was able to group a set of polygons in my temp folder in GEpro, export as a single .KIML file, and import into farmOS… and all 6 polgyons showed up, correctly positioned & named.
[08:58:40]<ludwa6>Bit of work then to organize hierarchy correctly in farmOS, but not too difficult.
[09:01:54]* JustTB has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
[09:15:53]<ludwa6>Now i’m wondering how i can enrich these Area descriptions with more information i have attached in my GIS. Q: Is that Description field able to store anything other than plain text? This being a web page, perhaps i could enter HTML (or Markdown, ideally) and have display correctly?
[09:36:14]* JustTB has joined #farmos
[09:43:19]<ludwa6>Hmm… I gather from this doc page that html is the default format: https://vdl.farmos.net/filter/tips/farm_format
[09:44:31]<ludwa6>but when i enter this html (link to an image of an Area), it does not display as a link: <a href="https://imgur.com/9N0sirD"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/9N0sirDh.jpg" title=“Eira Field image“ /></a>
[10:36:29]* JustTB has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
[10:40:46]<ludwa6>as i am evaluating this software for adoption by my farm, would love to see an instance that’s got all or most features implemented. Is there any such site that i might view, i wonder?
[10:54:33]<mstenta[m]>> I see. And it’s possible to ship Area data in&out via not just .KML, but also CSV i gather -yes? Can also ship all other data objects I/O via .CSV?
[10:54:33]<mstenta[m]>Area data isn't available via CSV, but assets and logs are
[10:55:05]<mstenta[m]>JSON/XML is also available for everything via API end points
[10:56:45]<mstenta[m]><ludwa6 "Now i’m wondering how i can enri"> The description field filters out most HTML I believe (for security reasons), but it will automatically make URLs into links I think
[10:57:17]<mstenta[m]><ludwa6 "but when i enter this html (link"> There is an image upload field for photos
[10:57:32]<mstenta[m]>And a files field for other file types
[10:58:02]<mstenta[m]><ludwa6 "as i am evaluating this software"> No unfortunately we don't have a populated demo set up... It's something we've talked about
[10:58:03]<ludwa6>Yes… But there’s a limit of 5 until i buy a license. And i’m not there just yet :-)
[10:58:28]<mstenta[m]>Yes if you're hosting on Farmier that's correct
[10:58:52]<mstenta[m]>(to prevent potential abuse during the trial)
[11:00:09]<ludwa6>yes. license fee is quite reasonable, for anyone who is committed to use the software, and i would have no problem paying it, if i were sure that this is going to be worth the effort. that’s the real issue with me right now, no problem with the license fee.
[11:01:13]<ludwa6>You know: what would really help me in this evaluation is if i could see an instance that’s using all the features well. Is there one you could point me to online?
[11:01:59]<ludwa6>oh, sorry: i just saw your A to this Q above.
[11:03:21]<ludwa6>Surprising that, in the spirit of open data and FOSS, nobody is prepared to share their farm data. I certainly have no problem sharing myself.
[11:04:35]<mstenta[m]>You could check out some more of the webinar videos
[11:04:42]<mstenta[m]>That's a good way to see it in action
[11:04:49]<mstenta[m]>With explanations
[11:04:50]<ludwa6>i noticed the URL on one of your demos -https://wolfesneck.farmos.net/- and tried to see that one (a public project, as i understand), but alas: it needs a login.
[11:05:43]<mstenta[m]>Yes right now the software doesn't have an option of making things public. Login is always required
[11:05:54]<mstenta[m]>Also something that's been discussed though
[11:06:07]<ludwa6>That’s a feature i would like to see for sure.
[11:06:08]<mstenta[m]>I would love to see that development
[11:06:33]<mstenta[m]>You can create a "viewer" login
[11:06:41]<ludwa6>Is that not a standard one-click parameter change in Drupal?
[11:06:46]<mstenta[m]>Which can see but not change anything
[11:07:01]<ludwa6>That’s a resonable work-around, i guess.
[11:07:04]<mstenta[m]>It probably wouldn't be too hard
[11:07:19]<mstenta[m]>Just permissions on the "anonymous role"
[11:33:20]<ludwa6>mkay: i just created a Visit0r account, with just one Role: Farm Viewer
[11:34:04]<ludwa6>so that allows one to read all, with Create and Edit permissions deactivated -right?
[11:34:33]<mstenta[m]>yup! that's the idea!
[11:35:49]<ludwa6>cool. let it be known hereby that anyone who wants to see my mess is welcome as Visit0r / Visit0r
[11:36:58]<mstenta[m]>Thanks ludwa6 ! :-D
[11:37:47]<ludwa6>won’t be very interesting until i do a lot more work, tho it seems… and my workday will be winding down soon, here in GMT
[11:53:01]<ludwa6>Is it possible to enable site visitors to auto-register with a real email (i.e validated by return email), i wonder?
[11:53:47]<mstenta[m]>Drupal has a setting for that yes - but that option is not currently available of Farmier hosting
[11:54:01]<mstenta[m]>It tends to lead to a LOT of spam bot registrations, in my experience
[11:54:16]<mstenta[m]>Which is not a battle I am interested in fighting :-)
[12:02:40]* JustTB has joined #farmos
[12:06:29]<ludwa6>ah, i can certainly understand that. minor point of friction for wannabe registrants to apply via mailto link; certainly worthwhile to keep spammers away.
[12:07:53]<ludwa6>hm, but then… whoever’s on the end of mailto link is gonna have the same problem. there must. be a better way, will give it a think.
[12:14:38]<mstenta[m]>ah not so much the mailto link issue... but that there will be LOTS of unwanted user's signing up for logins
[12:15:26]<mstenta[m]>(if i understand you correctly_
[12:15:57]<ludwa6>oh, i get that. i’m just saying: with a line of text carrying a mailto link, that way somebody could request that i give them a login to my site. But that’s a bad idea, obviously.
[12:16:36]<ludwa6>Still: could you put a line of text up for me on that “Access Denied” page i see on visiting https://wolfesneck.farmos.net ...
[12:17:02]<ludwa6>… to say something like “For read-only access to this site, login as Visit0r / Visit0r”. ?
[12:17:29]<ludwa6>on vdl, i mean -not wolfesneck, obviously :-)
[12:18:44]<ludwa6>I don’t need it now, but need to know you can do it if i decide to license the software.
[12:18:48]<mstenta[m]>ah gotcha - unfortunately customizations like that are tricky - i keep the "standard" farmier hosting as "standard" as possible - that's how i'm able to keep it cheap - don't need to worry about managing individual customizations
[12:19:09]<mstenta[m]>but you could put it on your farm's website (if you have one), with a link to the farmOS login
[12:22:55]<ludwa6>that’ s true, and this will work for me for now. Still: i find it strange that i’m the only one interested in offering public view of my farm’s data, if i’m reading you right.
[12:23:14]<mstenta[m]>oh no it's come up before as well
[12:23:23]<mstenta[m]>just never been a huge priority
[12:23:48]<mstenta[m]>we're not very rich with time at this point - there is a lot to do :-)
[12:24:29]<mstenta[m]>if it's something you're really into and want to try implementing, that would be awesome!
[12:24:34]<ludwa6>sure. and i really appreciate your giving me so much of your time here. i hope i can help to make it better for you and the other users somehow.
[12:24:41]<mstenta[m]>(one of the benefits of the open source model) :-)
[12:25:50]<mstenta[m]>building a sustainable open source project is a challenge - one that i love thinking about and talking about too
[12:26:10]<mstenta[m]>currently we're supported largely by sponsored development work, from groups/organizations that want to build specific features
[12:26:38]<ludwa6>is that your primary source of income? thie project, i mean.
[12:27:18]<mstenta[m]>it is right now, yes... i've managed to find a few organizations who really see the potential and want to build on top of it
[12:27:28]<mstenta[m]>but nothing is for certain - i'm trying to keep it going :-)
[12:27:35]<ludwa6>great to hear.
[12:27:56]<ludwa6>it’s come a long way in the last coupla years, i can see.
[12:28:03]<mstenta[m]>the hosting is really a small piece - i mainly see that as a way of getting people set up easily
[12:29:01]<ludwa6>nice. it is a nice smooth entry ramp -despite my squeaking and beeping here :-)
[12:31:24]<mstenta[m]>haha it's great to have your squeaking and beeping :-)
[12:46:57]<ludwa6>ACTION farming
[12:47:41]<mstenta[m]>i was just debating whether or not i want to try to plant my potatoes before the rains
[12:47:55]<mstenta[m]>but the ground is still pretty wet
[12:48:15]<mstenta[m]>springtime challenges
[14:04:40]* JustTB has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
[17:21:10]* JustTB has joined #farmos