| [19:05:27] | <mstenta[m]> | @jgaehring:matrix.org: oh weird. I just experienced the issue again I think, but this time a new log showed up without me going to the log form at all |
| [19:06:06] | <mstenta[m]> | All I did was open the app and click the "synced" link next to a previous log I had synced earlier today |
| [19:06:32] | <mstenta[m]> | And then: |
| [19:06:38] | <mstenta[m]> | ACTION uploaded an image: Screenshot_20190206-190616.png (87KB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/yvEKHAXvzWjTskZz... > |
| [19:06:49] | <mstenta[m]> | Notice the second one |
| [19:07:01] | <mstenta[m]> | That showed up without going to the log edit screen at all |
| [19:14:35] | <jgaehring[m]> | Whoa |
| [19:15:06] | <jgaehring[m]> | Are you taking a lot of pictures? |
| [19:19:18] | <jgaehring[m]> | Hehe, trying a bunch of things to break it... This did it: |
| [19:19:25] | <jgaehring[m]> | ACTION uploaded an image: Screenshot_20190206-191841.png (108KB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/hFVKLVJJtRrBimtp... > |
| [19:20:52] | <jgaehring[m]> | Although I blame the backend :-P |
| [19:46:19] | * bodie1[m] has joined #farmos |
| [19:58:26] | <mstenta[m]> | No only the first log I made has a picture |
| [19:58:32] | <mstenta[m]> | Oh how did you do it? |
| [19:58:54] | <mstenta[m]> | It seems to happen inconsistently for me so it's hard to replicate |
| [19:59:57] | <mstenta[m]> | Oh nm you were testing something else I see :-) |
| [20:01:44] | <mstenta[m]> | Yeah that could be backend related |
| [20:01:58] | <mstenta[m]> | File a bug report |
| [20:02:49] | <mstenta[m]> | Might be the same thing that breaks farmBOT |
| [20:13:22] | * Marflutter has joined #farmos |
| [20:13:23] | * Marflutter has left #farmos () |
| [20:37:10] | <mstenta[m]> | "farmOS Scout" seems to be in the lead :-) |
| [22:08:26] | * bathrobinson has joined #farmos |
| [22:08:27] | * bathrobinson has left #farmos () |
| [22:33:48] | * JustTB has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
| [22:39:05] | * Noktaeds has joined #farmos |
| [22:39:06] | * Noktaeds has left #farmos () |
| [22:49:04] | * JustTB has joined #farmos |
| [05:48:26] | * JustTB has quit (Quit: Leaving.) |
| [07:13:53] | * JustTB has joined #farmos |
| [09:17:24] | * JustTB has quit (Quit: Leaving.) |
| [10:59:36] | * JustTB has joined #farmos |
| [11:33:54] | <jgaehring[m]> | cool! |
| [11:39:01] | <jgaehring[m]> | mstenta: have you cleared the app cache? I'm still not able to reproduce that bug, wondering if it's a problem with the SQL schema or something like that |
| [12:11:39] | <mstenta[m]> | jgaehring: I haven't. I'll try that and see if it happens again. |
| [13:33:28] | <mstenta[m]> | jgaehring: Great feedback on the poll so far! |
| [13:33:56] | <mstenta[m]> | Looks like "farmOS Scout" is the favorite still. |
| [13:34:22] | <mstenta[m]> | I like sudokita 's justification that she described in https://riot.im/app/#/room/#goatech:matrix.org |
| [13:35:42] | <mstenta[m]> | And I've been giving more thought to the thoughts I expressed over there: |
| [13:35:44] | <mstenta[m]> | > I like the other ones two (lite, scout, field kit) but I also worry that they are too narrow to encompass the future vision of it becoming a core part of normal farmOS (essentially allowing a simplified offline-first experience the you can then optionally toggle into "advanced" mode) |
| [13:36:23] | <mstenta[m]> | (Here are sudokita 's thoughts for cross-post:) |
| [13:36:38] | <mstenta[m]> | > Given what you're describing I am inclined to say nay to mobile, client, and lite. Client does make the most sense but I would worry that it isn't descriptive enough. Lite makes it seem likes it's missing "pro" functionality so I would also say nay to that. I do like scout and field kit though because it does make give the impression that the tool is meant for in-field use regardless of the slimmed down functionality for |
| [13:36:39] | <mstenta[m]> | now, or the optional advanced mode |
| [13:37:05] | <mstenta[m]> | I'm thinking: we could still call it "Scout" when we think about it in the context of including it directly in farmOS too... |
| [13:37:11] | <mstenta[m]> | or even "Scout Mode" :-) |
| [13:37:22] | <mstenta[m]> | So I can envision using farmOS in a browser, and then toggling "Scout Mode" so you can take it offline |
| [13:37:25] | <jgaehring[m]> | Haha, nice! |
| [13:39:51] | <mstenta[m]> | So question: do you think we should rename the repo to farmOS-scout as well? (in combination with merging farmOS-native and farmOS-client) |
| [13:40:06] | <mstenta[m]> | Or do you think it make sense to still use the name farmOS-client internally for dev purposes |
| [13:40:11] | <sudokita[m]> | ooo i like scout mode |
| [13:40:17] | <mstenta[m]> | And just name the app "farmOS Scout" when it is published to the app stores |
| [13:41:23] | <mstenta[m]> | (eg: the native app would be based on the farmOS-client codebase, but the app would be called "farmOS Scout"... and in the web context, farmOS would just pull in the farmOS-client library JS during build) |
| [13:43:30] | <mstenta[m]> | This question also helps to decide what to call the module that's included with farmOS... we've been referring to it as farm_offline... but maybe farm_client or farm_scout is a better choice (the main things it would do are 1) pull in the farmOS-client JS library, 2) add it to farmOS (either on a new path, or embedded on all pages somehow), 3) add a service worker to help trigger it when offline |
| [14:00:52] | <mstenta[m]> | Maybe I'll start a GitHub thread to document all this stuff, along with a link to the poll and a summary of the results |
| [14:01:05] | <mstenta[m]> | Be good to have for referring people to in the future if we are ever asked "why is it called this" :-) |
| [14:02:21] | <jgaehring[m]> | oh good idea! |
| [14:03:44] | <mstenta[m]> | should i do that in farmOS-client? or native? |
| [14:09:03] | <jgaehring[m]> | Haha, hmm, I still keep thinking of native as the main repo |
| [14:10:15] | <mstenta[m]> | Ok either way... we'll be transferring all the issues regardless |
| [14:10:32] | <mstenta[m]> | I'll do it in native, since the "Scout" name will apply to the iOS/Android app store apps, at the very least |
| [14:11:40] | <jgaehring[m]> | Cool |
| [14:11:45] | <jgaehring[m]> | Thanks! |
| [14:12:46] | <mstenta[m]> | I'll also create one for the "older version of android" warning - so we have something to point to for documentation purposes |
| [14:13:03] | <mstenta[m]> | (i don't think we have an open issue for that already, do we?) |
| [14:23:01] | <jgaehring[m]> | pretty sure that's b/c of this: https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/latest/guide/platforms/android/index.... |
| [14:23:01] | <jgaehring[m]> | you're running Pie, right? |
| [14:23:21] | <mstenta[m]> | Oh ok great - I'll refer to that |
| [14:23:26] | <jgaehring[m]> | PhoneGap Build uses cordova-android Version 6.x.x |
| [14:23:28] | <mstenta[m]> | Yes I think so |
| [14:23:43] | <jgaehring[m]> | so good to have an open issue, but there may be nothing we can do about it |
| [14:24:00] | <mstenta[m]> | Oh so it's a PhoneGap Build issue specifically |
| [14:24:05] | <mstenta[m]> | Not Cordova |
| [14:24:24] | <jgaehring[m]> | both, really |
| [14:24:56] | <mstenta[m]> | Oooh.. because Pie is Android 9 |
| [14:24:58] | <jgaehring[m]> | even if we used cordova-android 7.x.x, it would only give us Android 8.1 |
| [14:25:03] | <jgaehring[m]> | right |
| [14:25:05] | <mstenta[m]> | Yea gotcha |
| [14:25:06] | <mstenta[m]> | Womp |
| [14:25:30] | <mstenta[m]> | Oh hey: https://cordova.apache.org/announcements/2018/11/23/cordova-android-7.1.... |
| [14:25:57] | <mstenta[m]> | > Update android-versions to 1.4.0, with added support for Android Pie (#573) |
| [14:26:02] | <mstenta[m]> | So maybe those other docs are outdated? |
| [14:26:20] | <mstenta[m]> | https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/573 |
| [14:26:40] | <mstenta[m]> | > * (seems to add support for Android Pie) |
| [14:28:56] | <jgaehring[m]> | oh i'll try it |
| [14:29:03] | <jgaehring[m]> | oh no i won't |
| [14:29:25] | <jgaehring[m]> | still gotta fix android studio i think |
| [14:29:38] | <jgaehring[m]> | then i can do it with the cli, instead of PGB |
| [14:30:30] | <mstenta[m]> | are you sure PGB doesn't support it? is that documented somewhere? |
| [14:31:01] | <mstenta[m]> | oh right you said it uses 6.x.x |
| [14:31:40] | <mstenta[m]> | hmm yea looks like that's right: https://build.phonegap.com/current-support |
| [16:24:42] | * JustTB has quit (Quit: Leaving.) |
| [16:25:05] | * JustTB has joined #farmos |
| [16:30:56] | * JustTB has quit (Quit: Leaving.) |
| [16:31:17] | * JustTB has joined #farmos |